Awards

ITLOS rules in favour of Ghana in long-standing maritime dispute with Côte d’Ivoire

On 23 September 2017, a Special Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) delivered its judgment on the longstanding maritime boundary dispute between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. The Special Chamber reconfirmed the relevance of the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Africa, Awards, Boundaries and Delimitation, Public International Law, UNCLOS

Paris court rejects application for review and withdrawal of arbitral enforcement order, despite allegations of fraud

The Paris Court of First Instance has rejected an application for the review and withdrawal of an enforcement order of an arbitral award, despite allegations of fraud and collusion between the arbitrator and the claimant. It also refused to the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Awards, Enforcement, Enforcement - Europe, Europe

Sovereign immunity in the DIFC Court

Last week, the Dubai International Financial Centre Court issued its decision in Pearl Petroleum Company Limited & Others v The Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq. The Court upheld its earlier decision which recognised two LCIA arbitration awards totalling US$2 billion … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Awards, Challenges to awards, DIFC, Enforcement, Jurisdiction, Middle East, Sovereign Immunity

Astro/First Media: Leave to appeal granted in Hong Kong enforcement proceedings

In the long-running Astro v First Media dispute, the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong (CFA) has granted First Media leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision refusing an extension of time to apply to set aside … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Awards, Challenges to awards, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China

Australian Court sets aside an international arbitration award and removes an arbitrator

The respondents in an international commercial arbitration were successful in the Federal Court in Australia in setting aside parts of two partial awards and removing the sole arbitrator pursuant to Articles 12, 18 and 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law. … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under ADR, Arbitration laws, Australia, Awards, Challenges to awards

PRC Court refuses to enforce an SIAC award made under Expedited Procedure

The Shanghai No.1 Intermediate Court (the Shanghai Court) recently refused to enforce a SIAC award under Article V(1)(d) of the New York Convention, which provides that the award may be refused if “[T]he composition of the arbitral authority or the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Awards, Challenges to awards, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China

Hong Kong Court upholds refusal to stay execution of enforcement order

Overview The Hong Kong Court of First Instance (CFI) has denied leave to appeal its May 2017 decision in  Israel Sorin (IZZY) Shohat v Balram Chainrai [2017] HKEC 1118. In that decision (see our previous post), Chow J refused to … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Awards, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China

Hong Kong Court confirms pro-arbitration stance

In U v A [2017] HKEC 468, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance dismissed an application to set aside an Order for enforcement of an ICC award rendered in Hong Kong. In her judgment, Mimmie Chan J reiterated that … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Awards, Challenges to awards, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China

Important Second Circuit Decision on Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards

In a significant recent judgment, CBF Industria De Gusa S/A v. AMCI Holdings, Inc. (2d Cir. 2017), the influential U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the Second Circuit) considered an arbitral award's preclusive effects and its ability to … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Awards, Enforcement, New York Convention, The Americas

Australian Court provides guidance on Art 33(3) of the Model Law, the doctrine of functus officio and when a ‘Final Award’ is not ‘final’

In Blanalko Pty Ltd v Lysaght Building Solutions Pty Ltd [2017] VSC 97, Croft J of the Victorian Supreme Court confirmed that a party is not required to rely on, or comply with the time constraint in, Art 33(3) of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Australia, Awards, Costs, Court intervention, Stays, UNCITRAL Model Law