ISDS

Event – The future of investment arbitration: have we reached a high water mark?

Herbert Smith Freehills and BIICL Investment Treaty Forum warmly invite you to attend ‘The Future of Investment Arbitration: Have We Reached a High Water Mark?’. Date Wednesday 1 November 2017 Time 17:00: Registration 17:30: Panel discussion followed by drinks and … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Events, Investment Arbitration, ISDS

The Federal Court of Australia recognises and enforces ICSID award

  The Australian judiciary has again proven that Australia is a pro-arbitration destination, by recognising and enforcing an award and decision rendered under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). In Lahoud v The Democratic … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under ADR, Arbitration laws, Australia, Awards, Enforcement, ISDS, Regions

Belgium asks for the CJEU’s opinion on the compatibility of the Investment Court System with European Law

On 6 September 2017 the Belgian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Didier Reynders submitted a request from Belgium to the Court of Justice of the European Union for an opinion on the compatibility of the Investment Court … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under EU, EU Law, Europe, ISDS, News, Public International Law

Herbert Smith Freehills launches blog series on NAFTA renegotiations

Herbert Smith Freehills is pleased to announce the launch of a new series of blog posts which will report on the latest developments in the NAFTA renegotiations. The series will run on our Public International Law Blog which provides analysis … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under ISDS, News, Public International Law, The Americas, Trade Agreements

Enforcement and dispute resolution under the Withdrawal Agreement and any future relationship agreement: no role for the CJEU….or is there?

On its face, the thrust of the UK Government’s Future Partnership Paper on Enforcement and Dispute Resolution (the Paper), published on 23 August, is to rule out the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, Enforcement, Enforcement - Europe, EU, EU Law, Europe, ISDS, News, Trade Agreements

NAFTA Renegotiation: ISDS reform objectives

The United States will lobby for changes to the investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS”) provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) in the upcoming discussions to renegotiate the regional treaty. ISDS reform is one of several “negotiating objectives” announced … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Public International Law, The Americas, Trade Agreements

EU – Japan Economic Partnership Agreement announced

On 6 July 2017 the EU and Japan announced an agreement in principle on their Economic Partnership Agreement (“EPA“).  The scale of this agreement is eye-popping: once in effect the EPA will cover nearly 40 percent of all goods exports, … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, East Asia, EU, Europe, ISDS, News, Trade Agreements

Second Circuit Upends Enforcement of ICSID Awards in New York, Eliminates Circuit Split

In a ruling handed down on July 11, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit resolved a circuit split that had sown legal uncertainty on the correct procedure for the enforcement in the United States of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enforcement, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Public International Law, Sovereign Immunity, The Americas

ICSID tribunal rules that it is neither necessary nor urgent to grant security for costs from a claimant with the benefit of third-party funding

An ICSID tribunal has rejected a State's application for security for costs in circumstances in which the other party had third-party funding in the form of ATE insurance which specifically provided for cover of the State's costs. Italy's request for … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Costs, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Third Party Funding

Is there an inherent tension between the EU’s investment court system and the EU legal order?

As discussed in our previous blog posts here and here, the EU has introduced a new system to resolve disputes arising between investors and states which may herald the beginning of a move away from the traditional use of investor-state arbitration. In … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under EU, EU Law, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Trade Agreements