Tag Archives: Alastair Henderson

SIAC signs Memorandum of Understanding with the Institute of Modern Arbitration of the Russian Federation

The last two years have seen considerable development of Russian arbitration law and practice, with changes to Russian arbitration law intended to enhance Russia’s market reputation as an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction.  In a further development, it was recently announced that the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Institutions, News, Russia

Recent developments in India-related international arbitration

Herbert Smith Freehills has issued the latest edition of its Indian international arbitration e-bulletin. In this issue we will consider Indian court decisions, including the arbitrability of allegations of fraud and non-arbitrability of trust disputes by the Supreme Court. We … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitrability, Asia, Enforcement, India, Institutions, News

Singapore Court of Appeal confirms the validity of “unilateral option to arbitrate” clauses

In the recent decision of Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd [2017] SGCA 32, the Singapore Court of Appeal confirmed that the Singapore courts will enforce a dispute resolution clause which gives only one party the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Asia, Enforcement, South East Asia

Should I stay or should I go? Singapore High Court declines to stay arbitration pending review of jurisdictional ruling

Overview In a recent ex tempore judgment in the case of Loblaw Companies Limited v Origin & Co Ltd & Another [2017] SGHC 59 ("Loblaw v Origin"), the Singapore High Court declined to exercise its discretion under s10(9) of the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Court intervention, Jurisdiction, Stays

‘Bare’ arbitration clauses and the extent to which the Singapore court may assist

In K.V.C Rice Intertrade Co Ltd v Asian Mineral Resources Pte Ltd and another Suit [2017] SGHC 32 ("KVC Action") the Singapore High Court discussed the extent to which the Singapore courts and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, in its … Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Asia, South East Asia

UPDATE: Singapore passes law to legalise third-party funding of international arbitration and related proceedings

On 10 January 2017 the Singapore Parliament passed amendments to the Civil Law Act legalising third-party funding in arbitration and related proceedings in Singapore (the "Amendments"). Following a year of positive developments for arbitration in Singapore, this latest development will … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Asia, South East Asia, Third Party Funding

SIAC Investment Arbitration Rules

The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) has announced the release of its Investment Arbitration Rules (the Rules), which came into force on 1 January 2017.  This release follows the earlier public consultation in February 2016, when practitioners were invited by … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Arbitration rules, Asia, Institutions, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, South East Asia, Third Party Funding

Sydney Arbitration Week: 21-25 November 2016

Sydney Arbitration Week has commenced with an extensive and interesting programme of arbitration conferences, seminars and presentations. One of the key events is the Fourth International Arbitration Conference which is organised by the Business Law Section of the Law Council of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Australia, Events

Applicable law of arbitration agreements: Singapore revisits the English case of Sulamérica

In the recent case of BCY v BCZ [2016] SGHC 249, the Singapore High Court considered whether there was a valid and binding arbitration agreement in the context of a negotiated but unsigned contract. The Court comprehensively summarised Singapore's position … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Asia, South East Asia

Singapore Court confirms validity of clauses providing for unilateral right to arbitration

In the recent decision in Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 23, the Singapore High Court confirmed the validity of "one-way" or unilateral clauses which bind one party to one dispute resolution method or … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Arbitration laws, Asia, South East Asia