Tag Archives: Hannah Ambrose

Herbert Smith Freehills’ Response to EU Consultation: the Future of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

As discussed in our blog post here, on 21 December 2016 the EU Commission launched a public consultation on the multilateral reform of the investment dispute settlement system. The consultation closed on 15 March 2017 with a full report of the responses anticipated later … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advice on State Contracts and Disputes, Arbitration proceedings, EU, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, News, Trade Agreements

English Court considers unilateral communications between arbitrator and party and anonymisation of judgments related to an arbitration

In a recent challenge to an award made under s68 of the English Arbitration Act 1996, in Symbion Power LLC v Venco Imtiaz Construction Company the English Court considered the issue of unilateral communications between a party-appointed arbitrator and its … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Arbitrators, Challenges to awards, Confidentiality

New York Convention 1958 to enter force in Angola on 4 June 2017

Angola has become the 157th Contracting State to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. On 6 March 2017, Angola deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention with the UN Secretary General.  Under … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Africa, Enforcement, New York Convention

Brexit—the future of state-to-state, investor-state and domestic dispute resolution

The Brexit White Paper The much-anticipated Brexit White Paper, ‘The United Kingdom’s exit from and new partnership with the European Union’, was published on 2 February 2017. This post focuses on a subject that has to date received relatively little … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, Brussels Regulation, EU, EU Law, Europe, Public International Law, Trade Agreements, TTIP

Inside Arbitration: Issue #3 of the publication from Herbert Smith Freehills’ Global Arbitration Practice

We are delighted to share with you the latest issue of the publication from Herbert Smith Freehills' Global Arbitration Practice, Inside Arbitration. In addition to sharing knowledge and insights about the markets and industries in which our clients operate, the publication … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Publications and Guides

EU launches consultation on multilateral reform of the investor-state dispute resolution system

The EU Commission (the Commission) has launched a public consultation on the multilateral reform of the investment dispute settlement system.  The survey is found here and responses are due by 15 March 2017.  The consultation is the next step in … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advice on State Contracts and Disputes, EU, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Public International Law, Trade Agreements

Advocate General issues opinion that the EU does not have exclusive competence to conclude the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement

In an opinion issued on 21 December 2016, EU Advocate General Eleanor Sharpston QC has concluded that the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (EUSFTA) will need to be finalised by the European Union and the Member States acting jointly, i.e. entered … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Brexit, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Public International Law, Trade Agreements, Uncategorized

CETA UPDATE: CETA is signed; Provisional application of CETA and Brexit; First government-to-government meeting to discuss establishing the multi-lateral investment court system

On 30 October 2016, the EU and Canada signed the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (the CETA).  As explained in our blog post here, the text of the CETA, which was originally agreed in 2014, was subjected to "legal scrubbing" … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under EU, Europe, ISDS, Public International Law

English court upholds arbitrator’s decision to award claimant the costs of third party funding

The English court has refused a challenge under s68(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) and held that a sole arbitrator did not exceed his powers in including the costs of third party funding within a costs award (Essar … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Awards, Challenges to awards, Costs, Third Party Funding

English Court refuses to allow challenge to arbitral award to be discontinued

The English Court has recently held that a party will not be able to discontinue appeal proceedings challenging an arbitral award in circumstances where to allow it do so would: (i) circumvent the jurisdiction of the supervisory court; and/or (ii) … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Awards, Challenges to awards, Court intervention, Enforcement