Tag Archives: Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies principles for determining when benefits enjoyed by a claimant following a breach of contract will be treated as collateral

The Supreme Court has ruled that the owners of a ship that was redelivered early in breach of a charterparty did not have to give credit for the benefit they obtained by selling the vessel for a higher price upon … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Contract, Remedies

Supreme Court on contractual interpretation: striking a balance between the language used and the commercial implications

In a judgment handed down yesterday (29 March), the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed an appeal relating to the construction of an indemnity clause: Wood (Respondent) v Capita Insurance Services Limited (Appellant) [2017] UKSC 24. The Supreme Court emphasised that it did … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Contract

Supreme Court refuses to apply a special jurisdiction rule to the tort of inducing breach of a jurisdiction clause

The Supreme Court has refused to craft a special rule for the tort of inducing a breach of contract where the contractual term which has been breached is an exclusive jurisdiction clause. It held that, where proceedings were commenced in … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Jurisdiction, Tort

Supreme Court reformulates test for when a claim will fail due to illegality

The Supreme Court has established a new approach to the question of whether a defendant will be able to rely on the defence of illegality: Patel (Respondent) v Mirza (Appellant) [2016] UKSC 42.  Under this new approach, the defence will … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Miscellaneous

Supreme Court clarifies status of Privy Council decisions

The Supreme Court has confirmed that, subject to one qualification, the English courts should never follow a decision of the Privy Council if it is inconsistent with a decision that would otherwise be binding on the lower court: Willers v … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Courts

Supreme Court finds tort of malicious prosecution extends to civil claims

The Supreme Court has held, by a majority of 5 to 4, that the tort of malicious prosecution is available for civil as well as criminal claims: Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 43.  This settles an important point that was previously uncertain, as there … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Tort

Supreme Court upholds celebrity injunction

The Supreme Court has today allowed an appeal by a celebrity (PJS) seeking an injunction preventing publication of details of his private life, by a majority of four to one: PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26.  In … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Confidentiality, Injunctions

Supreme Court confirms that company directors’ powers must be exercised for a proper purpose

In an important decision which will impact upon corporate disputes, the Supreme Court has confirmed that the exercise of an apparently unfettered discretionary power given to directors under the articles of association of a company must only be exercised for … Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Miscellaneous

Supreme Court clarifies test for implying terms into a contract

In a judgment handed down yesterday morning, the Supreme Court has clarified the law on when the court can imply a term that the parties have not expressly included in their contract, endorsing the traditional approach that the term either must … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Contract

Supreme Court rewrites English law rule on penalties

In a judgment handed down this morning, the Supreme Court has in effect re-written the rule on penalties, saying that the underlying rationale of the rule in English law has been misunderstood and that as a result the rule has … Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Contract, Remedies