Tag Archives: Christian Leathley

A warning shot for investor-state dispute settlement under NAFTA 2.0?

The US Trade Representative (USTR) is reportedly finalizing a proposal to dramatically restructure NAFTA’s investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism, transforming it into an “opt-in” regime under which each NAFTA state would elect whether or not to permit investors of other … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Americas, ISDS, ISDS Reform, Public International Law, Trade law, US

What to watch for as NAFTA (re)negotiators get to work

On August 16, 2017, trade representatives of the United States, Mexico and Canada will convene in Washington, DC for the first of seven scheduled rounds of negotiations in relation to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The negotiations have … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Americas, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform, News, Public International Law, Trade law, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact, US

NAFTA Renegotiation: ISDS reform objectives

The United States will lobby for changes to the investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS”) provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) in the upcoming discussions to renegotiate the regional treaty. ISDS reform is one of several “negotiating objectives” announced … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Americas, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform, News, Public International Law, The Americas, Trade law, US

ICSID tribunal rules that it is neither necessary nor urgent to grant security for costs from a claimant with the benefit of third-party funding

An ICSID tribunal has rejected a State's application for security for costs in circumstances in which the other party had third-party funding in the form of ATE insurance which specifically provided for cover of the State's costs. Italy's request for … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Proceedings, Europe, Investment Arbitration

ICSID announces sixteen topics for consideration in its review of the ICSID Arbitration Rules

Following invitations to ICSID member States and the public to submit topics for potential review, ICSID has published a paper on the Rules Amendment Process. The paper lists sixteen topics which are to be canvassed in the next stage of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Proceedings, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform

Herbert Smith Freehills’ Response to EU Consultation: the Future of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

As discussed in our blog post here, on 21 December 2016 the EU Commission launched a public consultation on the multilateral reform of the investment dispute settlement system. The consultation closed on 15 March 2017 with a full report of the responses anticipated later … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advice on State Contracts and Disputes, Arbitration Proceedings, EU, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, News

Urbaser v. Argentina and Burlington v. Ecuador: Investment arbitration is not over the counterclaims yet

Two recent decisions by tribunals have advanced the body of tribunal practice considering the issue of counterclaims by respondent states in investment treaty arbitration: Burlington Resources Inc. v. Ecuador, in which the tribunal awarded damages against the investor for breach … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Investment Arbitration, Jurisdiction, The Americas

EU launches consultation on multilateral reform of the investor-state dispute resolution system

The EU Commission (the Commission) has launched a public consultation on the multilateral reform of the investment dispute settlement system.  The survey is found here and responses are due by 15 March 2017.  The consultation is the next step in … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advice on State Contracts and Disputes, EU, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Public International Law

Advocate General issues opinion that the EU does not have exclusive competence to conclude the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement

In an opinion issued on 21 December 2016, EU Advocate General Eleanor Sharpston QC has concluded that the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (EUSFTA) will need to be finalised by the European Union and the Member States acting jointly, i.e. entered … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Brexit, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Public International Law, South East Asia, Trade law, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

Live webcast of hearing on jurisdiction and the merits: David Aven et al. v. Republic of Costa Rica (UNCITRAL Case No. UNCT/ 15/3) – Public Hearing

A hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in UNCITRAL Case No. UNCT.15/3, will be transmitted live in English and Spanish via internet feed from Monday, December 5, 2016 to Monday, December 12, 2016, excluding Saturday and Sunday, from 9:00 a.m. to … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Investment Arbitration, ISDS, News, Public International Law, The Americas, Video