Tag Archives: Hannah Ambrose

English Court rejects Ukraine’s attempt to set aside enforcement order on grounds of state immunity

The English Court (the “Court“) has dismissed an application by Ukraine to set aside a court order permitting Russian investor, PAO Tatneft, to enforce an arbitral award against Ukraine.  Ukraine argued that it was immune from the Court’s jurisdiction by … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Abuse of process, Arbitration Proceedings, Award, Enforcement, Europe, Immunity, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, MFN, Oil & Gas, Privileges and immunities, Sovereign Immunity/State Immunity, Ukraine

English Court finds that the foreign act of state doctrine may apply to arbitration proceedings

In the decision of Reliance Industries Limited & Ors v The Union of India [2018] EWHC 822 (Comm) the English Commercial Court (the Court) considered a number of challenges to an arbitration award brought under sections 67, 68 and 69 … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Act of State Doctrine, Arbitration Proceedings, Award, India, Jurisdiction, Oil & Gas, Public International Law, UK

State to state dispute resolution in the UK Government’s White Paper: arbitration with a potential role for the CJEU

The White Paper published yesterday, “The Future Relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union”, includes the UK Government’s proposal for the resolution of disputes between the UK and the EU under what the UK Government views as an … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, EU, EU Law, Europe, State to state claims, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact, UK

Upheaval and uncertainty in mineral regulation in parts of Africa: resurgence of resource nationalism highlights the importance of investment treaty protections

The last few months have seen significant changes to mining regulations in various African states, giving rise to a concern that a regional trend of resource nationalism may be (re-)emerging. In this context it is important for companies associated with … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Africa, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Mining, Oil & Gas, Public International Law, State Contracts, Stabilization Clauses and Disputes, Structuring Investments

State immunity: English court considers service of proceedings on a State in times of political unrest, and questions relating to enforcement of a foreign judgment against a State

In the recent decision of Certain Underwriters At Lloyds London v Syrian Arab Republic & Ors [2018] EWHC 385 (Comms) the English Commercial Court (the Court) considered the difficulties which may be encountered in trying to serve on a State. … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advice on State Contracts and Disputes, Enforcement, Privileges and immunities, Sovereign Immunity/State Immunity, State Immunity

Update on the future of ISDS: the discussions within UNCITRAL Working Group III – no apparent consensus to date

After a number of years of public debate in a variety of fora, the discussion of the future development of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) has recently moved to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). UNCITRAL Working Group … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

EU Council publishes Negotiating Directives for Convention establishing a Multilateral Investment Court: no real surprises but a couple of gaps

On 20 March, 2018 the Council of the European Union published negotiating directives dated 1 March 2018 authorizing the European Commission to negotiate a convention establishing a multilateral court for the settlement of investment disputes between investors and states. Whilst … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under EU, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

State-to-State Dispute Settlement under the EU’s latest draft of the Withdrawal Agreement: CJEU jurisdiction remains

On 15 March 2018 the European Commission published a revised version of the draft Withdrawal Agreement between the EU and the UK previously published on 28 February 2018 following consultation with the Member States and the European Parliament. The revised … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, EU, EU Law, Europe, State to state claims, UK

Security for costs granted by English Court in investment treaty award challenge in which claimants are receiving third-party funding

In its recent judgment in Progas Energy Limited and ors v Pakistan [2018], the English High Court (the Court) granted Pakistan’s request for security for their costs in defending a challenge to an investment treaty award. The Court declined Pakistan’s … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Proceedings, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Pakistan

State-to-State dispute settlement under the EU’s draft Withdrawal Agreement: CJEU jurisdiction not arbitration

We have known for some time now that the UK and EU have very different views regarding the state-to-state dispute resolution mechanism to be contained in the Withdrawal Agreement between the EU and the UK. The EU has never made … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, EU, Europe, Public International Law, State to state claims