Tag Archives: Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)

Herbert Smith Freehills’ Response to EU Consultation: the Future of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

As discussed in our blog post here, on 21 December 2016 the EU Commission launched a public consultation on the multilateral reform of the investment dispute settlement system. The consultation closed on 15 March 2017 with a full report of the responses anticipated later … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advice on State Contracts and Disputes, Arbitration Proceedings, EU, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, News

Brexit—the future of state-to-state, investor-state and domestic dispute resolution

The Brexit White Paper The much-anticipated Brexit White Paper, ‘The United Kingdom’s exit from and new partnership with the European Union’, was published on 2 February 2017. This post focuses on a subject that has to date received relatively little … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, EU, EU Law, Europe, Public International Law, Trade law, TTIP

EU trade agreement enters into effect with five southern African countries

On 10 June 2016 the EU signed an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the Southern Africa Development Community EPA Group comprising Botswana, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa and Swaziland (the SADC EPA). On 10 October 2016 that agreement entered into … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Africa, Economic partnership agreement, EU, Trade law, Trade/WTO, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

The future of ISDS in the TTIP: European Parliament recommends a “new system” of judicial decision-making

As reported in our previous blog posts (please click here and here), the proposed inclusion of investor-state-dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (the TTIP), has caused considerable debate amongst many stakeholders. Against this backdrop of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under EU, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact, US

The changing landscape of Investment Treaty arbitration – Herbert Smith Freehills comments on recent developments and the future of investment arbitration

As the US Senate is poised to pass legislation granting President Obama the trade promotion authority which will facilitate the passing of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), the future of the most controversial parts of the TPP and many other … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Investment Arbitration

China-Australia Free Trade Agreement signed

Australian Trade Minister Andrew Robb and Chinese Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng today signed the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) in Canberra, following the signing of a Declaration of Intent in November 2014 during Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to Australia … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Australia, China, ISDS Reform, Japan, Korea, Trade law, Trade/WTO, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

EU Commission issues “Concept Paper” on ISDS in the TTIP and beyond: proposals for “profound reform”

Further to its report on the outcome of the consultation on investment protection and investor-state dispute settlement in the TTIP, the EU Commission has issued a “Concept Paper” which envisages a very different future for resolution of investor-state disputes. The … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

Indian Government seeks comments on a proposed draft Model Text for the Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty

The Government of India (“GOI“) has recently published a draft “Model Text for the Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty” (“Model BIT“), which is understood to be intended to revise India’s model bilateral investment treaty of 1993 and to serve as a … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under India, Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform

Forthcoming Chatham House and Herbert Smith Freehills Symposium: “TTIP: shaping the future for investor-state dispute settlement” – 4 March 2015

The proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the EU and the US, two of the world’s largest economies, is intended to remove trade barriers, create wealth and promote investment.  On 13 January, the European Commission published the results … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Americas, Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform, News, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

Investment protection and ISDS in the TTIP: the discussion continues with more consultation around the corner

Yesterday afternoon, the EU Commission issued its Report on the outcome of the public consultation on the inclusion of investment protection and investor-state-dispute-settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) being negotiated between the EU and the US. … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Americas, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform, News, Trade law, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact