Arbitration proceedings

Indian Supreme Court rules that Indian courts have jurisdiction to hear an application to set aside an award issued in Malaysia

In its recent decision in Union of India v Hardy Exploration and Production (available here), the Supreme Court of India found that a contractual clause stipulating Kuala Lumpur as the ‘venue’ of arbitration did not amount to a choice of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Challenges to awards, Court intervention, Enforcement, India

English Court refuses to grant an injunction against the enforcement of a s1782 US Evidence Order

In a decision dated 24 August 2018, the English Commercial Court (the “Court“) dismissed Dreymoor Fertilisers Overseas PTE Ltd’s (“Dreymoor“) application to continue an injunction preventing the enforcement of an order of a U.S. court granting discovery under section 1782 … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Confidentiality, Court intervention, Document production, Europe, Evidence, Procedures in arbitration, The Americas

Recent Developments in India-related International Arbitration

Herbert Smith Freehills has issued the latest edition of its Indian international arbitration e-bulletin. In this issue we consider various court decisions, which cover issues such as the applicability of the Arbitration Amendment Act 2015, binding non-signatories to an award, … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitrability, Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Asia, Global Pound Conference, India, India Disputes, Institutions, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, News

Tribunal awards India first BIT case win, dismissing claims of French investor

An UNCITRAL arbitral tribunal has reportedly dismissed a US$36 million claim by a French investor, Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SAS (“LDA“), against India under the 1997 France-India bilateral investment treaty (“BIT“). The award is not public at this time, but press … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Asia, Awards, India, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Jurisdiction

Reliance v Union of India: English Court confirms that there is no serious irregularity under s68(2)(a) if an issue of construction decided by the tribunal is “squarely in play”

In Reliance Industries Limited & Ors v The Union of India [2018] EWHC 822 (Comm) the English commercial court (the Court) considered a number of challenges to parts of an arbitration award brought under sections 67, 68 and 69 of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration proceedings, Challenges to awards, Europe, India, Procedures in arbitration

HONG KONG COURT OF APPEAL: COMMON LAW ACTIONS AVAILABLE TO ENFORCE ARBITRAL AWARDS

Two key developments emerge from the long-running proceedings in Xiamen Xinjingdi Group Co Ltd v Eton Properties Ltd [2016] 2 HKLRD 1106 and Xiamen Xinjingdi Group Co Ltd v Eton Properties [2018] HKCFI 910. The Hong Kong Court of Appeal … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Arbitration rules, Asia, Awards, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China, Jurisdiction

Award dismissing a claim for inordinate and inexcusable delay survives challenge in the English court

In Grindrod Shipping Pte Ltd v Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd, the English High Court (“the Court“) rejected an application under s68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (“the Act“) to challenge an Award (the “Award“). Six years after the proceedings … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration proceedings, Arbitrators, Challenges to awards, Costs, Europe

West Tankers principle unaffected by Recast Brussels Regulation; mandatory foreign jurisdictional rules do not encroach on scope of widely worded arbitration clause

In Nori Holdings Limited et al v PJSC Bank Okritie Financial Corporation [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm) the English court has applied the Recast Brussels Regulation, finding that the West Tankers principle remains applicable and, as a consequence, refused to grant … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitrability, Arbitration clauses, Arbitration proceedings, Brussels Regulation, Court intervention, Europe, Jurisdiction, Russia

English Commercial Court orders stay of Lebanon-seated arbitration in ‘exceptional’ case

In the most recent decision in the Sabbagh family feud, Sabbagh v Khoury & Ors [2018] EWHC 1330 (Comm), the English Commercial Court ordered the stay of parallel Lebanon-seated arbitration proceedings. This was despite the tribunal in that case having … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Court intervention, Europe, Interim relief, Middle East

Delhi High Court refuses to grant injunction restraining Vodafone’s second BIT arbitration against India

In a decision dated 7 May 2018, the Delhi High Court dismissed the Government of India’s application to declare Vodafone’s second BIT arbitration proceedings in relation to the retrospective tax liability imposed on Vodafone’s 2007 acquisition of Hutchison Whampoa’s Indian … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Asia, Court intervention, India, Investment Arbitration, ISDS