Arbitration proceedings

U.S. Supreme Court’s First Opinion of 2019: Kavanaugh Favours Arbitrators’ Power to Decide Arbitrability

The U.S. Supreme Court’s first opinion of 2019, written by recently appointed Justice Brett Kavanaugh, confirms the long-standing support of the Court for arbitrators to decide the issues of arbitrability of a dispute submitted to arbitration.  The unanimous ruling defends … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitrability, Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, The Americas

Prague Rules on efficiency in arbitration now launched

The new Rules on the Efficient Conduct of Proceedings in International Arbitration (Prague Rules) launched last month in the Czech Republic and aim to provide a more efficient framework for arbitral procedure which can be used to streamline a dispute, … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Arbitration rules, Document production, Procedures in arbitration

GAR Guide to Construction Arbitration now available to download, including chapter on “Construction Arbitration and Turnkey Projects” by HSF’s James Doe and David Nitek

London-based Construction & Infrastructure Disputes partners James Doe and David Nitek have authored the chapter on ‘Construction Arbitration and Turnkey Projects’ in the second edition of Global Arbitration Review’s Guide to Construction Arbitration. Launched last year, The Guide to Construction … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Construction, Procedures in arbitration

Indian Supreme Court rules that Indian courts have jurisdiction to hear an application to set aside an award issued in Malaysia

In its recent decision in Union of India v Hardy Exploration and Production (available here), the Supreme Court of India found that a contractual clause stipulating Kuala Lumpur as the ‘venue’ of arbitration did not amount to a choice of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Challenges to awards, Court intervention, Enforcement, India

English Court refuses to grant an injunction against the enforcement of a s1782 US Evidence Order

In a decision dated 24 August 2018, the English Commercial Court (the “Court“) dismissed Dreymoor Fertilisers Overseas PTE Ltd’s (“Dreymoor“) application to continue an injunction preventing the enforcement of an order of a U.S. court granting discovery under section 1782 … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Confidentiality, Court intervention, Document production, Europe, Evidence, Procedures in arbitration, The Americas

Recent Developments in India-related International Arbitration

Herbert Smith Freehills has issued the latest edition of its Indian international arbitration e-bulletin. In this issue we consider various court decisions, which cover issues such as the applicability of the Arbitration Amendment Act 2015, binding non-signatories to an award, … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitrability, Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Asia, Global Pound Conference, India, India Disputes, Institutions, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, News

Tribunal awards India first BIT case win, dismissing claims of French investor

An UNCITRAL arbitral tribunal has reportedly dismissed a US$36 million claim by a French investor, Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SAS (“LDA“), against India under the 1997 France-India bilateral investment treaty (“BIT“). The award is not public at this time, but press … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Asia, Awards, India, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Jurisdiction

Reliance v Union of India: English Court confirms that there is no serious irregularity under s68(2)(a) if an issue of construction decided by the tribunal is “squarely in play”

In Reliance Industries Limited & Ors v The Union of India [2018] EWHC 822 (Comm) the English commercial court (the Court) considered a number of challenges to parts of an arbitration award brought under sections 67, 68 and 69 of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration proceedings, Challenges to awards, Europe, India, Procedures in arbitration

HONG KONG COURT OF APPEAL: COMMON LAW ACTIONS AVAILABLE TO ENFORCE ARBITRAL AWARDS

Two key developments emerge from the long-running proceedings in Xiamen Xinjingdi Group Co Ltd v Eton Properties Ltd [2016] 2 HKLRD 1106 and Xiamen Xinjingdi Group Co Ltd v Eton Properties [2018] HKCFI 910. The Hong Kong Court of Appeal … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Arbitration rules, Asia, Awards, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China, Jurisdiction

Award dismissing a claim for inordinate and inexcusable delay survives challenge in the English court

In Grindrod Shipping Pte Ltd v Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd, the English High Court (“the Court“) rejected an application under s68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (“the Act“) to challenge an Award (the “Award“). Six years after the proceedings … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration proceedings, Arbitrators, Challenges to awards, Costs, Europe