Stays

Implied horizontal contract prompts stay of proceedings S9 AA 1996

In Mercato Sports v Everton[1], the English High Court found that two parties were bound by an implied horizontal contract containing an arbitration clause. Accordingly, it granted a stay of proceedings under section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (‘S9 … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration clauses, Europe, Stays

New South Wales CA imports arbitration clause from one entity to another, stays proceedings

In Warner Bros Feature Productions Pty Ltd v Kennedy Miller Mitchell Films Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 81, the New South Wales Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the New South Wales Supreme Court by referring a dispute to arbitration … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Australia, Court intervention, Stays

Parallel court and arbitration proceedings: English High Court grapples with further case management issues in Panama Canal dispute, clarifying that service of a defence pending appeal on refusal to grant a stay will not constitute “a step towards answering the substantive claim”

In our previous blog post on Autoridad del Canal de Panama v Sacyr, S.A. & Ors, we considered a failed application to stay English court proceedings brought in a dispute in which related ICC arbitration proceedings are also on foot. … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration proceedings, Europe, Stays

English High Court refuses stay of proceedings despite possible overlap with issues subjected to parallel ICC arbitration proceedings.

A consortium of construction companies (the Consortium) was unsuccessful in obtaining a stay of court proceedings pending before the English High Court (the Court), even though parallel related ICC arbitration proceedings are ongoing. The Court rejected the application for a … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration proceedings, Europe, Jurisdiction, Stays

English Court Stays Enforcement of Micula ICSID Award Against Romania

In Micula & Ors v Romania & Anor [2017] EWHC 31 (Comm) the English High Court stayed enforcement of a 2013 ICSID award in favour of Swedish investors Ioan and Viorel Micula against Romania (the "Award"), but refused to set … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Enforcement, Enforcement - Europe, EU, EU Law, Europe, Investment Arbitration, Stays

Should I stay or should I go? Singapore High Court declines to stay arbitration pending review of jurisdictional ruling

Overview In a recent ex tempore judgment in the case of Loblaw Companies Limited v Origin & Co Ltd & Another [2017] SGHC 59 ("Loblaw v Origin"), the Singapore High Court declined to exercise its discretion under s10(9) of the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Court intervention, Jurisdiction, Stays

Australian Court provides guidance on Art 33(3) of the Model Law, the doctrine of functus officio and when a ‘Final Award’ is not ‘final’

In Blanalko Pty Ltd v Lysaght Building Solutions Pty Ltd [2017] VSC 97, Croft J of the Victorian Supreme Court confirmed that a party is not required to rely on, or comply with the time constraint in, Art 33(3) of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Australia, Awards, Costs, Court intervention, Stays, UNCITRAL Model Law

Australian Federal Court stays winding up application to allow arbitration of underlying dispute

The Federal Court of Australia has recently held that a winding up application made in respect of a joint venture company should be stayed and the substantive underlying matters of dispute between the joint venture parties be referred to arbitration … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitrability, Arbitration clauses, Arbitration laws, Australia, Jurisdiction, Stays, UNCITRAL Model Law

When does “may” mean “shall”? Hong Kong Court rejects argument that permissive language creates either a binding arbitration agreement or a right to compel arbitration

In The Incorporated Owners of Wing Fai Building, Shui Wo Street v Golden Rise (HK) Project Company Limited DCCJ 225/2016, a Hong Kong court considered the effect of a dispute resolution clause that provided that parties "may" refer disputes to … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Hong Kong & China, Stays

Hong Kong Court of Appeal declines leave to appeal stay in favour of arbitration notwithstanding procedural irregularity

In Wing Bo Building Construction Co Ltd v Discreet Ltd (HCMP 775/2016), the Hong Kong Court of Appeal ("CA") has declined an application for leave to appeal a decision by the Court of First Instance ("CFI") to stay the action … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Hong Kong & China, Stays