Herbert Smith Freehills - Arbitration notes

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Team
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Asia
      • Hong Kong & China
      • East Asia
      • South East Asia
    • Middle East
    • The Americas
    • Australia
    • India
    • Africa
  • Public International Law
    • Investment Arbitration
    • Sanctions
    • International Human Rights
    • Boundaries and Delimitation
    • Advice on State Contracts and Disputes
  • Our blogs
    • ADR
    • Asia Disputes
    • Brexit
    • Employment
    • Fintech
    • FSR
    • Insurance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation
    • Mining
    • Private Wealth and Trust Disputes
    • Product Liability
    • Public International Law
    • UK Real Estate Development
    • Digital TMT and Sourcing
    • Regulatory, Governance, Remediation and Culture
    • Data
  • Website

Tag Archives: foreign act of state

19 July, 2018

Reliance v Union of India: English Court confirms that there is no serious irregularity under s68(2)(a) if an issue of construction decided by the tribunal is “squarely in play”

In Reliance Industries Limited & Ors v The Union of India [2018] EWHC 822 (Comm) the English commercial court (the Court) considered a number of challenges to parts of an arbitration award brought under sections 67, 68 and 69 of … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Arbitration proceedings, Challenges to awards, Europe, India, Procedures in arbitration

Tagged as Adam Johnson QC, Andrew Cannon, arbitrable, Arbitration, challenges to awards, foreign act of state, Hannah Ambrose, s67 AA1996, s68 AA1996, s69 AA1996, Vanessa Naish, waiver

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to be notified of new posts.

  • Stay connected

    Follow Herbert Smith Freehills on:

    LinkedIn
    Twitter

    Subscribe via RSS

    RSS
  • Search this blog

  • Tag cloud

    Alastair Henderson Andrew Cannon Anti-suit injunction Arbitration Argentina Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) Brussels Regulation Caroline Kehoe challenge to award China Chris Parker Christian Leathley Craig Tevendale Donny Surtani Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Enforcement England and Wales English Arbitration Act 1996 English law EU Expropriation Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Hannah Ambrose Herbert Smith Freehills Hong Kong Iain Maxwell ICC ICSID Arbitration India Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 investment arbitration Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) ISDS Jurisdiction Nicholas Peacock Nick Peacock Russia set aside Singapore Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) UAE UNCITRAL Model Law US Vanessa Naish Webinar
  • Categories

    • ADR (52)
    • Advice on State Contracts and Disputes (21)
    • Africa (38)
    • Arbitrability (29)
    • Arbitration Act 1996 (57)
    • Arbitration clauses (112)
    • Arbitration laws (135)
    • Arbitration proceedings (66)
    • Arbitration rules (87)
    • Arbitrators (52)
    • Asia (222)
    • Australia (61)
    • Awards (115)
    • Banking and Finance (5)
    • Boundaries and Delimitation (10)
    • Brexit (5)
    • Brussels Regulation (8)
    • Challenges to awards (128)
    • Confidentiality (12)
    • Construction (5)
    • Costs (23)
    • Court intervention (45)
    • CPTPP (2)
    • Cybersecurity (2)
    • Damages (8)
    • DIFC (15)
    • Document production (8)
    • East Asia (19)
    • Emergency Arbitration (6)
    • Enforcement (167)
    • Enforcement – Europe (43)
    • EU (28)
    • EU Law (49)
    • Europe (217)
    • Events (17)
    • Evidence (5)
    • Expedited Arbitration (4)
    • Finance (11)
    • Global Pound Conference (7)
    • Hong Kong & China (157)
    • Independence (4)
    • India (72)
    • India Disputes (19)
    • Institutions (92)
    • Interim relief (15)
    • International Human Rights (22)
    • Investment Arbitration (180)
    • ISDS (49)
    • Japan (5)
    • Jurisdiction (47)
    • Macao (2)
    • Middle East (58)
    • New York Convention (72)
    • News (196)
    • Panama Convention (1)
    • Podcast (6)
    • Procedures in arbitration (27)
    • Public International Law (118)
    • Publications and Guides (23)
    • Regions (8)
    • Russia (8)
    • Sanctions (24)
    • Scottish Independence (2)
    • Singapore (5)
    • South East Asia (80)
    • Sovereign Immunity (24)
    • Stabilisation clauses (2)
    • State succession (3)
    • Stays (17)
    • Summary procedures (2)
    • The Americas (83)
    • Third Party Funding (10)
    • Third-Party Rights (10)
    • TPP (6)
    • Trade Agreements (16)
    • TTIP (4)
    • Uncategorized (80)
    • UNCITRAL Model Law (14)
    • UNCLOS (3)
    • Video (12)
    • webinar (2)
    • Winding-up (1)
  • Related links

    • Herbert Smith Freehills
    • Insights
    • International arbitration
    • Litigation notes blog
    • PIL notes blog
  • Archives

  • The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Herbert Smith Freehills – Arbitration notes
© Herbert Smith Freehills LLP 2019
Cookie policy | Legal notices and disclaimers | Privacy
Powered by: WordPress | Octagon Creative Ltd
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.