Tag Archives: Nicholas Peacock

English Court rejects claim that notice of arbitration given in a foreign language is not proper notice

In a dispute between an English company and a Russian company, the English High Court (the Court) refused to set aside an order enforcing a Russian arbitration award on the grounds that the English company had not been given notice … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Challenges to awards, Enforcement, Enforcement - Europe, Europe, Russia

Indian Supreme Court upholds English High Court’s decision on parties’ choice of London seat

The Indian Supreme Court’s judgment in Roger Shashoua v Mukesh Sharma sheds further light on the court’s approach to interpreting arbitration agreements, particularly regarding the parties’ implied choice of seat. The court found that the designation of London as the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Asia, India

Russian arbitration: are international sanctions impacting party choice?

Ever since the introduction and then expansion of international sanctions on Russia (in particular by the US and the EU), arbitration practitioners have questioned whether this will prompt a change in the party selection of international arbitration in Russia-related commercial … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Europe, Russia, Sanctions

Mixed messages to investors as India quietly terminates bilateral investment treaties with 58 countries

The Government of India says it has sent notices to terminate bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with 58 countries, including 22 EU countries.  It has been reported that many of these BITs will cease to apply to new investments from as … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, India, Investment Arbitration, Trade Agreements

Arbitration in India: a pro-arbitration approach?

Nick Peacock, Head of the India Disputes practice at Herbert Smith Freehills speaks with Moazzam Khan (Co-head International Dispute Resolution Practice at Indian law firm, Nishith Desai Associates) to discuss the current approach taken by the Indian courts towards arbitration.  Nick … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitrability, Arbitration laws, Asia, India, Video

India and Brazil conclude negotiations of Bilateral Investment Treaty

As previously noted in April 2015, India amended its model bilateral investment treaty (the Indian Model BIT) and has reportedly been deploying it in recent months to seek to re-negotiate bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with over 47 countries (see previous … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, India, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, News, Public International Law, The Americas

English court upholds arbitrator’s decision to award claimant the costs of third party funding

The English court has refused a challenge under s68(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) and held that a sole arbitrator did not exceed his powers in including the costs of third party funding within a costs award (Essar … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Awards, Challenges to awards, Costs, Third Party Funding

Dispute Resolution choices for Finance Parties: A practical look at recent developments affecting dispute resolution options

Thursday 14th July 2016, 12.45 – 1.45pm BST Finance parties are often inclined to revert to favoured dispute resolution choices in their transactions. This default position is largely based on their perception of what offers the greatest flexibility or the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration proceedings, Banking and Finance, EU Law, Uncategorized