Tag Archives: set aside

Set-aside not a backdoor to appeal: Hong Kong Court

In N v W [2018] HKCFI 2405, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance refused to remit or set aside an award on the basis that an arbitrator had misconducted proceedings, demonstrating its reluctance to entertain such claims absent direct … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Hong Kong & China

Back whence it came: Hong Kong Court remits Award for serious irregularity

A tribunal had decided liability and awarded sums as due on a basis not advanced by the claimant. In P v M [2018] HKCFI 2280, The Hong Kong Court of First Instance decided that this approach breached the “fundamental rule … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hong Kong Court Refuses Recognition of Mainland Award on Public Policy Grounds

On 18 October 2018, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance (Court) in Z v Y [2018] HKCFI 2342 refused to recognise an Award of the China Guangzhou Arbitration Commission by reason of public policy. Mimmie Chan J presided and … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enforcement, Hong Kong & China, Uncategorized

Indian Supreme Court rules that Indian courts have jurisdiction to hear an application to set aside an award issued in Malaysia

In its recent decision in Union of India v Hardy Exploration and Production (available here), the Supreme Court of India found that a contractual clause stipulating Kuala Lumpur as the ‘venue’ of arbitration did not amount to a choice of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration clauses, Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Challenges to awards, Court intervention, Enforcement, India

HONG KONG COURT GIVES “DUE WEIGHT” TO SUPERVISORY COURT ON ENFORCEMENT

In U v S [2018] HKCFI 2086, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance (Court) dealt with an application to adjourn an application to set aside an enforcement order. In granting the adjournment, Chan J took into account public policy … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China, Uncategorized

Be on time to preserve your right to Active Remedies – the Singapore High Court considers a party’s duty to apply promptly when challenging the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal

In Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd (“RALL“) v Avant Garde Maritime Services (Private) Limited (“AGMS“) [2018] SGHC 78, the Singapore High Court dismissed an application to set aside an award on jurisdiction, on the basis that the applicant had failed to … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Asia, Enforcement, Jurisdiction, Procedures in arbitration

English Court rejects Ukraine’s attempt to set aside enforcement order on grounds of state immunity

The English Court (the “Court“) has dismissed an application by Ukraine to set aside a court order permitting Russian investor, PAO Tatneft, to enforce an arbitral award against Ukraine.  Ukraine argued that it was immune from the Court’s jurisdiction by … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Challenges to awards, Enforcement, Enforcement - Europe, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Sovereign Immunity

English Court dismisses attempt to set aside LCIA award on grounds of serious irregularity

In the recent case of X v Y [2018] EWHC 741 (Comm), the English High Court dismissed an application to set aside an arbitral award under s68 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) on the basis that the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration Act 1996, Awards, Challenges to awards, Europe, Procedures in arbitration

Astro v Lippo: First Media appeal succeeds in Hong Kong

At its final attempt, First Media has overturned the Hong Kong courts’ earlier decisions to enforce five arbitral awards against it. In a judgment dated 11 April, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (CFA) unanimously allowed First Media’s appeal, … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Asia, Awards, Challenges to awards, East Asia, Enforcement, Hong Kong & China

Inside Arbitration: Issue #5 of the publication from Herbert Smith Freehills’ Global Arbitration Practice

We are delighted to share with you the latest issue of the publication from the Herbert Smith Freehills Global Arbitration Practice, Inside Arbitration. In addition to sharing knowledge and insights about the markets and industries in which our clients operate, … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arbitration laws, Arbitration proceedings, Asia, DIFC, Europe, Hong Kong & China, Interim relief, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Middle East, Procedures in arbitration, Public International Law, Publications and Guides, South East Asia