The High Court has granted an application by a bank to strike out a misrepresentation claim by a property investment SPV, which repeated a similar claim that had been struck out by the court in previous proceedings due to a failure to comply with an unless order. The court also dismissed a parallel disclosure application … Read more

The High Court has dismissed an application (under the Bankers’ Book Evidence Act 1879) by the CFO of a telecommunications company for access to bank documents for use in Canadian extradition proceedings (initiated by US prosecutors who were seeking to join the CFO as a co-defendant to criminal proceedings in the US because she was … Read more

As reported in our previous blog post, the Supreme Court has handed down judgment in a keenly anticipated case concerning the scope of extraterritorial application of the SFO’s document compulsion powers under section 2(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA): R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] … Read more

On 5 February 2021, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2 concerning whether the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) can require a foreign company to produce documents held overseas, pursuant to its investigation powers under section 2(3) of … Read more

The High Court has dismissed an application by a group of unidentified investors for Norwich Pharmacal relief (or, alternatively, pre-action disclosure under CPR 31.16) in relation to a potential GBP £50 million damages claim against the defendant bank for an alleged breach of contract/negligence in connection with the sale of various tax mitigation schemes: Zeus … Read more

In a recent decision in the group litigation brought in respect of the Ingenious Media film partnerships the High Court has ruled that each claimant should provide disclosure in relation to their investment history, as this may be relevant to: (a) their financial sophistication and risk appetite, which may in turn inform the scope of … Read more

Another recent High Court decision has considered the question of privilege in a regulatory context: A v B & Anor [2020] EWHC 1491 (Ch). As with other recent decisions of this kind, the issue arose in the context of an auditor required to produce documents to its regulator, the Financial Reporting Council (“FRC”). The decision … Read more

The High Court has held that a bank waived privilege in all contemporaneous communications with its lawyers relating to particular transactions that were alleged to be a sham, as the bank had deployed the lawyers’ advice that the transactions were lawful in order to support its case on the merits. That was regardless of whether … Read more