Hong Kong Insurance Authority prepares for direct regulation of insurance intermediaries in mid-2019 – what is the progress so far?

It is anticipated that in around mid-2019, the Insurance Authority (IA) will take over the regulation of insurance intermediaries from the three self-regulatory organisations (SROs). In preparation for the commencement of the new regime, the IA has launched several public consultations on guidelines and rules. For our full briefing on these developments, please click here.


Second Wave of United States Sanctions Against Iran Re-Imposed

Following President Trump’s decision on May 8, 2018 to withdraw the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (“JCPOA”), the US government announced that it would re-impose pre-JCPOA nuclear-related Iran sanctions (both primary and secondary) that were lifted under the JCPOA. As we reported previously, two “wind-down” periods—of 90 and 180 days respectively—commenced from the day of the announcement, during which non-US, non-Iranian companies were encouraged by the US government to withdraw from operations in Iran that would be affected by re-imposed sanctions. OFAC’s guidance discouraged non-US persons from engaging in new activity during the wind down periods, and stated that any such new activity may be a factor in connection with future enforcement action for actions taken after the wind-down period.

Continue reading


How far can a sanctions clause protect a party from having to perform their contractual obligations – and in the case of Iran-related sanctions concerns, how does this interact with the Blocking Regulation? In Mamancochet Mining Limited v Aegis Managing Agency Limited and Others[2018] EWHC 2643, the High Court held that, in order to avoid payment of a claim, insurers were required to show that payment would expose them to sanctions under US or EU law. A mere exposure to the risk of a sanction was not sufficient.

In this post, our Insurance Disputes team consider the implications of the decision. Continue reading


China is advancing its policies to open up its markets and attract more foreign investment. This year, the financial sector is one of the focus areas for liberalisation. On 11 April 2018, Yi Gang, the governor of People’s Bank of China announced a detailed timetable (Timetable) for certain liberalisation policies in respect of the financial sector. In this e-bulletin, we summarise the key aspects of the Timetable and some of the other related regulations which have been issued recently. Please click here to read our full briefing.

Karen Ip
Karen Ip
Partner, Beijing
+86 10 6535 5135
Nanda Lau
Nanda Lau
Partner, Shanghai
+86 21 2322 2117
Tianchan Li
Tianchan Li
Associate, Shanghai
+86 21 2322 2155

William Hallatt
William Hallatt
Partner, Head of Financial Services Regulatory, Hong Kong
+852 2101 4036
Hannah Cassidy
Hannah Cassidy
Partner, Hong Kong
+852 2101 4133


New Insurance Authority in Hong Kong commences regulation of insurers with enhanced powers

With effect from 26 June 2017, the independent Insurance Authority (IA) assumed its regulatory responsibilities and replaced the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) in regulating insurers. The IA will be a much more powerful regulator than its predecessor, with enhanced authorisation and supervisory powers, as well as inspection, investigation and disciplinary powers over insurers.

Continue reading

Financial firms: protecting customer personal data

A recent case provides a rare example of the criminal prosecution of an individual (in this case the former employee of an insurer) for breach of the Data Protection Act 1988 (DPA). 

David Barlow Lewis was a former employee of the insurer LV. He offered an ex-colleague £3,000 a month to send him the details of customers involved in road accidents. She refused to do so, and Lewis was subsequently prosecuted at Bournemouth Magistrates’ Court for attempting to commit an offence under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 . He had knowingly or recklessly attempted to obtain personal data without the data controller’s consent.

Continue reading

Mitigating cyber security exposures: risk transfer through cyber insurance

Now may be the time to review your cyber risk mitigation strategy and give serious consideration to whether the financial cost of cyber attacks could be transferred to insurers at a fair price.

Cyber security is amongst the leading risks for organisations around the globe. In the last few years most organisations have suffered cyber attacks of some sort and a series of notable breaches have received heavy media coverage and regulatory scrutiny. Breaches damage not only organisations but also their customers. 

Continue reading

Authorising third country insurance firms: has the Commission got it wrong?

maddockGeoff Maddock, partner

Email | Profile

tel: +44 20 7466 2067 mobile: +44 7785 255016

By Geoff Maddock, corporate insurance partner

Commission view on authorisation

In July 2015 a Commission official expressed a controversial view on when third country insurance firms need authorisation. This was at a fully minuted meeting of the “Expert Group on Banking, Payments and Insurance”. The Commission said that a third-country insurance firm may only insure risks located in an EEA member State through a branch authorised by the competent supervisory authority of that member state.

I believe this opinion is wrong. If indeed it were right it would have a damaging effect on the London and probably other insurance markets. I give my reasons below. Continue reading

FCA expresses concern over use of delegated authorities in general insurance

A recent FCA report on the use of delegated authorities in general insurance serves as a warning to insurers, in particular, to look carefully at whether current arrangements are “fit for purpose”.  Where they are not, changes must be made.  The FCA can be expected to take action against firms whose mishandling of this type of arrangement has caused customer detriment.

Continue reading