Error: Can't connect Warning: mysqli_query() expects parameter 1 to be mysqli, null given in /home/customer/www/hsfnotes.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/hsfnotes/template-parts/tpl_filters.php on line 186
Warning: mysqli_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be mysqli_result, null given in /home/customer/www/hsfnotes.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/hsfnotes/template-parts/tpl_filters.php on line 187
Refusing to pay arbitration deposits is a common strategy employed by parties to delay or make proceedings difficult for the counterparty. The recent case of JKP Sdn Bhd v Anas Construction Sdn Bhd clarifies that the effects of non-payment of arbitration fees are fact sensitive, and finds that non-payment alone will not always result in the arbitration agreement becoming inoperable. Read more
In the recent Malaysian Federal Court case of Lai Fee & Anor v. Wong Yu Vee & Ors, the Courts reiterates the need for parties to have good faith in carrying through with their contracts and has shown that it will not hesitate to find a company's shareholders or directors liable under Section 540 of the Companies Act 2016 when a company dishonestly conducts the contract in a way to avoid liability for their side of the bargain. Read more
Following on from our previous updates in 2019, 2020, and 2021, we analyse the publicly available caseload statistics for the usage of various arbitral institutions by Malaysian parties. Our analysis of the numbers indicates that for 2021 and 2022, the AIAC and SIAC continue to remain the preferred arbitral institutions by Malaysian parties, while on the other hand, there has been a decrease in the use of the HKIAC. Read more
For the first time, the Malaysian High Court has found that party-appointed experts owe implied duties to the court. It is well-established that expert witnesses owe a duty to assist courts and arbitrators, but this is typically understood as requiring experts to provide their evidence independently and impartially. Read more
The Federal Court in Pembinaan SPK Sdn Bhd v Conaire Engineering Sdn Bhd-LLC & Anor [2023] 3 MLRA 287 has recently affirmed the legal position in Malaysia that a judgment creditor may institute a fresh action in the local courts to enforce a foreign judgment from a non-reciprocating country. Read more
The Malaysian High Court in Malaysia Resources Corporation Bhd v Desaru Peace Holdings Club Sdn Bhd [2022] MLJU 3355 has reconfirmed that if the same interim relief can be granted by an arbitral tribunal and the courts, a party should first apply to the tribunal. Read more
Alastair Henderson, Priya Aswani and Kin-Hoe Loi have recently published an article in the Asian Dispute Review (October 2022 edition). This article provides an update on recent developments in the Brunei courts and the choice of parties in deciding where and how their disputes should be resolved, and considers what may lie ahead. Read more
Craig Shepherd and Arnold Hoong have recently published an article in the Global Arbitration Review's Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2023. This article explores the effect of sanctions on contractual obligations within projects in the Asia-Pacific region as well as globally, and discusses what project owners and contractors should look out for. Read more
Construction disputes between contractors and employers in Thailand can take years to be resolved in court or arbitration. In response, Thailand is considering the introduction of a draft bill titled “Act on the Settlement of Disputes regarding Payment in Construction Contracts”. Read more