In October 2013, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the much-anticipated report of its thematic review into anti-money laundering (AML) and anti-bribery and corruption (ABC) systems and controls at asset management and platform firms. The report follows the FSA/FCA’s previous thematic reviews of ABC controls in commercial insurance broking (2010), ABC controls in investment banks (2012), and AML and sanctions controls in trade finance (2013). As with other thematic work, whilst the review is of a particular sector, the FCA expressly expects other regulated firms to consider the findings and examples of good and poor practice. Continue reading
The Serious Fraud Office (“SFO“) had its first day in court in a Bribery Act prosecution on 24 September 2013, with three of four defendants connected with a £23m fraud at Sustainable AgroEnergy plc (“AgroEnergy“) facing charges of making and accepting a financial advantage contrary to sections 1(1) and 2(1) of the Bribery Act 2010. Continue reading
The European Parliament and Council of Ministers have agreed the final form of the new EU rules for the disclosure, on a project by project basis, of payments to governments by companies operating in the extractive industries. The EU’s agreement is part of a suite of transparency initiatives which are designed to promote good governance and improved national development outcomes for developing countries.
All large companies “active” in the oil, gas and minerals industries or the logging of primary forests will be affected and the rules will apply to both EU-incorporated companies and non-EU companies that have a listing in the EU.
We have summarised in a briefing the key aspects of the new requirements, when they will come into force and how they compare with the similar requirements being introduced in the United States under the Dodd-Frank Act.
Please email Fiona Rafla if you would like a copy of this briefing.
Daniel Hudson, Karen Anderson Jeremy Sher and Richard Wright comment on recent developments concerning the EU sanctions regimes applying to Myanmar (Burma), North Korea, Syria and Libya.
In our earlier briefing we reported on the Government’s consultation to introduce Deferred Prosecution Agreements (“DPAs”) – a new mechanism for addressing criminal conduct by commercial organisations. On 23 October, the Ministry of Justice published its Response to that Consultation and confirmed that it intends to introduce DPAs by way of an amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill currently before the House of Lords. In this briefing we consider the key aspects of the Government’s consultation response (the “Response”) and the current DPA proposals.
On 17 May 2012 the Ministry of Justice published a consultation paper ‘Consultation on a new enforcement tool to deal with economic crime committed by commercial organisations: Deferred prosecution agreements‘. The paper proposes – as an alternative to the current options of criminal prosecution or a civil recovery order – a variant of the US model of Deferred Prosecution Agreements (“DPAs”) to address offending by corporate entities. The consultation (https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/deferred-prosecution-agreements) is open until 9 August 2012. At recent meetings, the Solicitor General has urged stakeholders to respond to the consultation, so that the Government has a wide range of inputs on this important subject. This briefing summarises the key elements of the proposal and highlights some of the potentially troubling aspects for companies which may be addressed in consultation responses. Continue reading