Tag Archives: Hannah Ambrose

EU submits paper and work plan to UNCITRAL Working Group III advocating systemic reform as the only answer to concerns about investor-state dispute resolution

In advance of the next meeting of UNCITRAL Working Group III (WG III) in April 2019, the European Union and its Member States have made a submission on “Establishing a standing mechanism for the settlement of international investment disputes” (the … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under EU, European Guidance, Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform

Third party intervention in investment arbitration: Tribunal admits NGO submissions in Gabriel Resources’ claim against Romania concerning mining project

The Tribunal in Gabriel Resources v Romania recently issued an order (the Order) in response to an application (the Application) made by three Romanian NGOs, as non-disputing parties, for participation and an amicus submission (the Submission) in an ICSID arbitration … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Europe, Investment Arbitration

Advocate General finds that CETA’s “Investment Court System” is compatible with EU law

One of the Advocates General to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU“), Advocate General Bot, has issued an opinion confirming that the mechanism for the settlement of disputes between investors and states provided for in the Comprehensive … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under EU, EU Law, Europe, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform, Public International Law, Structuring Investments, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact

Update on the future of ISDS: UNCITRAL Working Group III decides three areas for reform, indicating change is likely in 2019

The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL“) has been considering the possible reform of investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS“). UNCITRAL Working Group III (“WGIII“) has been given a broad mandate to identify concerns regarding ISDS procedure, consider whether reform … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under International organisations, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform

English Court of Appeal finds good arguable case that public policy exception applies to the foreign Act of State Doctrine allowing Ukraine to argue duress in claim under Eurobonds

In Ukraine v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc [2018] EWCA Civ 2026 the English Court of Appeal (the Court) partially upheld an appeal in favour of the state of Ukraine (Ukraine), reversing in part the summary judgment granted to … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Act of State Doctrine, non-justiciability, Public International Law, Russia, State Immunity, UK, Ukraine

Brexit: dispute resolution between the EU and the UK, under the withdrawal agreement and in the event that there is “no deal”

At a critical time in the Brexit negotiations, in the latest podcast on the Herbert Smith Freehills Podcast channel, Andrew Cannon and Hannah Ambrose discuss dispute resolution between the UK and the EU. They look at the way in which … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, EU, EU Law, Europe, State to state claims, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact, UK

English Court rejects Ukraine’s attempt to set aside enforcement order on grounds of state immunity

The English Court (the “Court“) has dismissed an application by Ukraine to set aside a court order permitting Russian investor, PAO Tatneft, to enforce an arbitral award against Ukraine.  Ukraine argued that it was immune from the Court’s jurisdiction by … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Abuse of process, Arbitration Proceedings, Award, Enforcement, Europe, Immunity, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, MFN, Oil & Gas, Privileges and immunities, Sovereign Immunity/State Immunity, Ukraine

English Court finds that the foreign act of state doctrine may apply to arbitration proceedings

In the decision of Reliance Industries Limited & Ors v The Union of India [2018] EWHC 822 (Comm) the English Commercial Court (the Court) considered a number of challenges to an arbitration award brought under sections 67, 68 and 69 … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Act of State Doctrine, Arbitration Proceedings, Award, India, Jurisdiction, Oil & Gas, Public International Law, UK

State to state dispute resolution in the UK Government’s White Paper: arbitration with a potential role for the CJEU

The White Paper published yesterday, “The Future Relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union”, includes the UK Government’s proposal for the resolution of disputes between the UK and the EU under what the UK Government views as an … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Brexit, EU, EU Law, Europe, State to state claims, Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact, UK

Upheaval and uncertainty in mineral regulation in parts of Africa: resurgence of resource nationalism highlights the importance of investment treaty protections

The last few months have seen significant changes to mining regulations in various African states, giving rise to a concern that a regional trend of resource nationalism may be (re-)emerging. In this context it is important for companies associated with … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Africa, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Mining, Oil & Gas, Public International Law, State Contracts, Stabilization Clauses and Disputes, Structuring Investments