Herbert Smith Freehills - PIL notes

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • Team
  • Events
  • Sections
    • Investment Arbitration
    • Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact
    • State Immunity
    • Boundaries and Delimitation
    • Sanctions
    • State Contracts, Stabilization Clauses and Disputes
    • Trade/WTO
    • International Human Rights
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Middle East
    • Americas
    • Australia
  • Our blogs
    • ADR
    • Asia Disputes
    • Arbitration
    • Brexit
    • Employment
    • Fintech
    • FSR
    • Insurance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation
    • Mining
    • Private Wealth and Trust Disputes
    • Product Liability
    • UK Real Estate Development
  • Website

Tag Archives: Malaysian Historical Salvors Sdn Bhd v The Government of Malaysia

14 November, 2013

Dawn of a new era for investment protection in South Africa – draft investment law to replace protections offered under investment treaties published for public comment

On 1 November 2013, the South African Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has released its new “Promotion and Protection of Investment” bill (PPI Bill) for public comment (for a copy of the PPI Bill, see here). The PPI Bill … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Leave a Comment

Filed under Investment Arbitration

Tagged as Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), BIT Review, BIT Termination, Expropriation, Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET), Investment, Jurisdiction, Malaysian Historical Salvors Sdn Bhd v The Government of Malaysia, South Africa, South Africa Arbitration Act 1965, South Africa-Germany BIT, South Africa-United Kingdom BIT, South African Promotion and Protection of Investment Bill 2013

  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address to be notified of new posts.

  • Stay connected

    Follow Herbert Smith Freehills on:

    LinkedIn
    Twitter

    Subscribe via RSS

    RSS
  • Search this blog

  • Tag cloud

    Andrew Cannon Argentina Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) Brexit Bribery Business and Human Rights Christian Leathley Corporate Crime English State Immunity Act 1978 EU European Commission European Regulation European Union EU sanctions Expropriation Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Hannah Ambrose Human Rights Iain Maxwell ICSID ICSID Arbitration investment arbitration investor-state arbitration Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Iran ISDS Jurisdiction Money Laundering Russia Sanctions state immunity Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) TTIP UK Ukraine UNCITRAL arbitration UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights United States US US sanctions Vanessa Naish Venezuela Webinar
  • Categories

    • Abuse of process
    • Act of State Doctrine
    • Advice on State Contracts and Disputes
    • Africa
    • Alien Tort Statute
    • Americas
    • Arbitration Proceedings
    • Argentina
    • Asia
    • Australia
    • Award
    • Boundaries and Delimitation
    • Brexit
    • Business & Human Rights
    • China
    • Corporate Crime
    • Crisis Management
    • East Asia
    • ECHR
    • Economic partnership agreement
    • Enforcement
    • Environment
    • EU
    • EU Law
    • Europe
    • European Guidance
    • European Regulation
    • France
    • FSA Rules
    • Germany
    • Hong Kong & China
    • ICJ
    • Immunity
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • International Criminal Court
    • International Human Rights
    • International organisations
    • Investment Arbitration
    • Iran
    • Iraq
    • ISDS
    • ISDS Reform
    • ITLOS
    • Japan
    • Jurisdiction
    • Korea
    • Land-grabbing
    • Latin America
    • Liechtenstein
    • Malaysia
    • Middle East
    • Mining
    • Nationality
    • News
    • non-justiciability
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pakistan
    • Privileges and immunities
    • Provisional measures
    • Public International Law
    • Russia
    • Sanctions
    • Scottish Independence
    • Singapore
    • South East Asia
    • Sovereign Immunity/State Immunity
    • sovereignty
    • Spain
    • State Contracts, Stabilization Clauses and Disputes
    • State Immunity
    • State succession
    • State to state claims
    • Structuring Investments
    • The Americas
    • TPP
    • Trade law
    • Trade/WTO
    • Treaty negotiation, interpretation and impact
    • TTIP
    • UK
    • Ukraine
    • UN
    • UN Convention on Transparency
    • Uncategorized
    • UNCLOS
    • US
    • Video
    • Vietnam
  • Related links

    • Arbitration notes blog
    • Herbert Smith Freehills
    • HSF public international law
    • Insights
  • Archives

  • The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Herbert Smith Freehills – PIL notes
© Herbert Smith Freehills LLP 2018
Cookie policy | Legal notices and disclaimers | Privacy
Powered by: WordPress | Octagon Creative Ltd
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.